Rulings ( 7227 results )

AAR: Denies concessional rate benefit for works contract finding no nexus with power generation work

  • In Favour of Not Applicable
  • Citation Number : TS-833-AAR-2018-NT

AAR: Applies HC/AAAR ratio, upholds PP Woven Bags/sacks classification under chapter 39

  • In Favour of Not Applicable
  • Citation Number : TS-829-AAR-2018-NT

AAR: ‘Mouth Freshener’ classifiable under Chapter Heading 2106, liable to 18% GST

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-830-AAR-2018-NT

AAR: Projects under Government schemes carried out for business purpose constitutes “works contract”, taxable at 18%

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-832-AAR-2018-NT

AAR: Delayed payment surcharge' not a 'separate service', taxable basis 'initial supply' nature

  • In Favour of Applicant
  • Citation Number : TS-831-AAR-2018-NT

NAA: Grants relief to Maruti Suzuki, finds no profiteering absent reduction in tax rate

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-1-NAA-2019-NT

AAAR: Upholds GST on 'trade & commerce' activities of charitable trust; Distinguishes Sai-Publication ruling

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-821-AAAR-2018-NT

NAA: Dismisses application, finds no profiteering either post GST implementation or rate reduction

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-817-NAA-2018-NT

NAA: Dismisses application, absent base-price increase finds no profiteering by ‘Speaker’ supplier

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-818-NAA-2018-NT

NAA: Increase in base-price due to discount reduction does not amount to profiteering

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-819-NAA-2018-NT

NAA: Upholds profiteering by L'oreal distributor, directs investigation for subsequent period

  • In Favour of Complainant
  • Citation Number : TS-815-NAA-2018-NT

AAAR: Upholds AAR, Employees service in corporate office to distinct units constitutes' supply'

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-814-AAAR(KAR)-2018-NT

NAA: Finds no profiteering on supply where tax rate increased post-GST

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-816-NAA-2018-NT

HC: HC directs High-Level Committee constitution to consider granting relief upon Entertainment tax abolition

  • In Favour of Not Applicable
  • Citation Number : TS-969-HC(BOM)-2018-NT

NAA: Finds no profiteering absent reduction in tax rate & increase in base price of readymade garments

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-806-NAA-2018-NT

NAA: No profiteering by tiles dealer where selling price reduced pursuant to tax rate reduction

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-809-NAA-2018-NT

NAA: Finds no profiteering by Panasonic LED' supplier absent increase in tax rate

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-807-NAA-2018-NT

NAA: No profiteering on supply of Koil Mattress where tax rate increased post-GST

  • In Favour of Respondent
  • Citation Number : TS-808-NAA-2018-NT

NAA: Holds HUL guilty of profiteering for not passing GST rate-cut benefit to consumers

  • In Favour of Complainant
  • Citation Number : TS-805-NAA-2018-NT

HC: Prohibits Revenue from recovering GST on premium for leasing land allotted for hospital

  • In Favour of Not Applicable
  • Citation Number : TS-804-HC(ALL)-2018-NT